Nokia is one of the most innovative players in the mobile phone industry and there is no denying the illustrious fact. Ever since the Finnish manufacturer has stepped into this immensely progressive industry, the world has had not a moment of respite from what seems like a celebration of style and super charged performance. Churning the nectar of creative technology from this evolutionary world is what the leading mobile phone creator knows best and the phone market is abuzz with reverberations of this undeniable truth. Flaunting its stuff in almost all the categories of mobile phones, Nokia has displayed a unique versatility in its identity. With a view to portray this versatile quality, I present a comparative study of the Nokia 6300 and the Nokia 7373 as leaders in their respective categories. The Nokia 6300 has been released by the leading manufacturer as an ultra slim sophisticated phone with a collection of the most evolved features for an unperturbed performance. Wrapped up in a stainless steel casing, the phone oozes oodles of charm in a frame of 106.4 mm x 43.6 mm x 11.7 mm. The 2.0 megapixel camera with 8 x digital zoom and viewfinder makes the phone an amiable device to practice your photography skills. Entertainment is a strong asset of the Nokia 6300, with a powerful music player belting high quality music in MP3, MP4, AAC, AAC+, Enhanced AAC+, H263 and H264 formats, and flanked by a stereo FM radio and visual radio for added effects.
The Nokia 7373, on the other hand presents itself as a highly fashionable phone from the very popular L'Amour collection. The phone has a 2 Inch QVGA colour screen whose whole section swivels open to reveal a prettily dressed up keyboard. Apart from being a stylish phone, the Nokia 7373 is also a feature rich phone with components like a 2.0 megapixel camera with 8 x digital zoom, a digital music player supporting several formats, an FM radio and visual radio, latest connectivity tools and Internet browsers.
The Nokia 7373 displays both style as well as functionality in its most effective form and clearly turns out to be the better choice out of the two.
